Scientific Methods - 2024-2025 (Research ethics)

Questions for the course "Scientific Methods" with the topics: Research ethics (lecture 4).


Click the button to start the quiz

Start Quiz

<- Leave quiz



Questions in the quiz (31)


What are research ethics?

  • Set of ethics that govern how scientific research is performed at research institutions and how is is disseminated

What is a typical and historical practice of research, that is now considered unethical?

  • Torture or inhumane treatment of research subjects

  • Milgram experiment of 1961

Principles of research integrity

  • Honesty

  • Transparency

  • Accountability

In the principle of research integrity, what does honesty mean?

  • Ensuring trustworthiness of research

  • Requires accurate reporting

What areas are honesty important in?

  • Presenting, intereting research results

  • Making claims based on findings

  • Review research

  • Acknowledging the work of others (Gift & Ghost authorship)

In the principle of research integrity, what does transarency mean?

  • Ensures credibility of research

  • Requires openness

What areas are transparency important in?

  • Planning research

  • Applied research methods

  • Results and conclusions

  • Conflict of interest

In the principle of research integrity, what does accountability mean?

  • Ensure all parties involved in the research should be accountable

  • Researchers need to accept responsibility

What areas are accountability important in?

  • Accuracy and reliability of results

  • Adherence to regulations and guidelines

  • Taking appropriate action in case of misconduct

What regulation are researchers at SDU bound by?

  • SDU's Review Ethics Committee

  • The Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity

What are typical types of scientific frauds?

  • Fabrication

  • Falsification

  • Plagiarism

  • Fake peer review

What does scientific fraud, regarding fabrication, mean?

  • Making up data or results and recording or reporting them

  • "Filling out" remaining experiment runs

  • Claims made on incomplete data or assumed results

What does scientific fraud, regarding falsification, mean?

  • Changing research results (data)

  • Omitting research results (data)

  • Manipulation of research materials, equipment, or processes

What does scientific fraud, regarding plagiarism, mean?

  • Using or representing the work of others as your own work

  • Citing or using not yet published work

  • Citing or using not publicly available work

  • Forgetting to cite

Is using or representing the work of others as your own work, constitutes plagiarism if it is done unintentionally?

  • Yes

Is the following plagiarism? if so, why?

Original source (Nickerson, 1999):
"In order to communicate effectively with other people, one must have a reasonably accurate idea of what they do and do not know that is pertinent to the communication. Treating people as though they have knowledge that theydo not have can result in miscommunication and perhaps embarrassment."

The work to be reviewed (author, unknown):
"Effective communication depends on a generally accurate knowledge of what the audience knows. If a speaker assumes too much knowledge about the subject, the audience will either misunderstandor be bewildered."

  • Yes, as paraphrasing still needs to be cited

What are typical types of self-plagiarism?

  • Using a dataset from a previous study, without making the reader aware

  • Submitting work for publication, containing conclusions or passages that have been published before, without citing the original source

  • Publishing similar or identical work in multiple publications / journals

Is the following plagiarism? if so, why?

Article 1 (Krashen, S., 2012):
"Sometimes we have to write long papers, but most of the time, it is unnecessary: the papers often contain long introductions more suitable for doctoral dissertations or review “state of the art” papers apparently designed to provide evidence that the author is well-read."

Article 2 (Krashen, S., 2013):
"Sometimes we have to write long papers to treat a topic adequately, but much of the time, it’s unnecessary: Papers often contain long introductions more suitable for doctoral dissertations, apparently intended to provide evidence that the author is well-read..."

  • Yes, this is self-plagiarism

  • Yes, as article 1 is not cited in article 2

Is it allowed to use graphs, charts, figures or images?

  • Yes, but they must be cited in the caption

  • Yes, however tables should not be duplicate, it should be a recreation of the data

  • No, if they are not cited

What is the responsibilities as a researcher?

  • You must not inflict harm

  • Do not cause physical or psychological pain

  • Maintain privacy and confidentiality

  • Be cautious where data are stored in regards to privacy

  • You must not deceive

  • Honest to the participants

  • Honest to the audience

  • No laws are broken

In which order, should authorship be given in this case?

"Jamal is a graduate student working under the supervision of professor, Dr. Kerry. Dr. Kerry is conducting research on software security and has collected data from various software systems. Jamal uses Dr. Kerry’s data to investigate a research question he formulated independently, focusing on software vulnerability analysis rather than general software security. His question is his own idea, but is still based on his understanding of software security gained through Dr. Kerry. Jamal’s friend, Darcie, helped Jamal design a specialized software tool for vulnerability detection, but did not contribute in any other way to the research. When writing up his results, Dr. Kerry helped Jamal write the methods section of his manuscript and reviewed his final results and conclusions, as well as the final draft of the entire manuscript"
Ref: University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics. "A Guide to Research Ethics." (2003)

  • Jamal, Dr. Kerry, Darcie

What is the ethical concercs in the following case?

Students are conducting a study on user behavior in a mobile app. They want to collect user data, including personal information and usage patterns, without explicitly informing the users.

  • Lack of informed consent

  • Privacy violation

How would you address the ethical concerns in the following case?

Students are conducting a study on user behavior in a mobile app. They want to collect user data, including personal information and usage patterns, without explicitly informing the users.

  • Obtain informed consent from users

  • Inform users about the data collection and usage

  • Allow users to opt out of data collection

  • Anonymize the data

Which of the following are examples of plagiarism?

a. quoting a sentence verbatim and citing the author with page number

b. copying and changing a few words in a paragraph without citing the author

c. borrowing an idea from another author and citing them

d. paraphrasing your own previous work with a citation of yourself

  • b

In the following case, is there any plagiarism and why?

Belinda is publishing her first article that builds on the research of a similar project she did three years prior with her colleague, Isaiah. In Belinda’scurrent article she has placed a graph from the article she and Isaiah co-authored about their previous research. Isaiah created the original graph.
Ref: University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics. "A Guide to Research Ethics." (2003)

  • Yes, this is plagiarism

  • Yes, as the graphs have been previously published

  • Yes, as the idea originated with another entity

What is the ethical concercs in the following case?

Students are conducting a user study to evaluate a new software application. They intentionally select participants who are likely to give positive feedback to validate theirhypothesis.

  • Bias in participant selection

  • Manipulation of results

How would you address the ethical concerns in the following case?

Students are conducting a user study to evaluate a new software application. They intentionally select participants who are likely to give positive feedback to validate theirhypothesis.

  • Random sampling

  • Objective reporting of results

What is the main ethical concercs in the following case?

A game development student, Alex, is conducting research on player engagement in online multiplayer games. At the same time, Alex's professor, Dr. Harris, serves as a paid consultant for a major gaming company that develops and publishes online multiplayer games.

  • Conflict of interest

What ethical concerns whould need to be adressed in the following case?

A game development student, Alex, is conducting research on player engagement in online multiplayer games. At the same time, Alex's professor, Dr. Harris, serves as a paid consultant for a major gaming company that develops and publishes online multiplayer games.

  • Bias in research guidance

  • Falsification

How would you address the ethical concerns in the following case?

A game development student, Alex, is conducting research on player engagement in online multiplayer games. At the same time, Alex's professor, Dr. Harris, serves as a paid consultant for a major gaming company that develops and publishes online multiplayer games.

  • Full disclosure

  • Seek independent review

  • Separation of roles

  • Prioritize ethical considerations

What should be done in this case?

Marcus and Clay are game developers collaborating on a research project focused on user feedback for a new mobile game they've created. Clay is responsible for conducting user interviews to gather valuable insights on gameplay and user experiences. One day, Marcus learns that while Clay is interviewing research participants, if he does not elicit an answer, he invents one and passes it off as truthful data collection. Marcus questions Clay and he denies the allegation.

  • Marcus is obligated to report Clay's activity to the person in charge of the research project

  • Marcus must continue to go up the chain until with reporting, until action is taken and the behavior stops